top of page

No New Money. No Neighbourhood Contract. So What Do We Do?

  • Apr 28
  • 4 min read

We talk about this all the time.


Resources are stretched. The ask is growing. Neighbourhood health is the direction, and the infrastructure isn't there yet.


Primary care leaders know this. The frustration isn't the context; it's what comes next. Or rather, what doesn't.


At PCN Plus this year, I embarrassed myself a little. I got quite passionate (more than I expected) about the frustration of trying to move the conversation forward. We all know there's no new money. We all know there's no neighbourhood contract. I was trying to say: so what do we actually do with that?


Leadership in Chaos


The Satir Change Model describes how systems respond to disruption. It moves through resistance, into chaos, the phase where the old model no longer fits, and the new one hasn't formed yet.


Effort goes in. Clarity doesn't come back out.


That is not failure. It is a predictable stage of change. But it doesn't make it easier to lead through, especially when the performance pressure remains regardless.


Graph illustrating "The Satir Change Model," showing five stages: Late Status Quo, Resistance, Chaos, Integration, New Status Quo.


Perceived Heroes and Villains


At a talk I gave at Best Practice last year, I described the characters that tend to show up when change is being asked of a group.


The perceived hero. The perceived villain. The supporting cast.


And I use "perceived" deliberately, because these are not fixed roles. They are how people read each other in the moment.


Almost everyone in these rooms believes that more integrated working would improve patient care. That's rarely the divide.


The divide is resource and capacity.


➡️ Some people are trying to find a way forward regardless of the constraints.


➡️ Some people genuinely cannot see how to do it without more time, more money, more capacity than they have.


➡️ And some are watching both positions and trying to work out which one is more true.


The perceived villain is often just the person saying out loud what others haven't quite put into words yet. This takes a kind of courage, but it is not often seen this way.


This is what leadership in the chaos phase actually looks like. You're not navigating a values question. You're navigating a resource reality in a room full of people trying to figure out the same thing.



The Permission Question


There is also the pressure to be seen as doing something.

 

Neighbourhood working comes with a gravitational pull. Government direction, system expectations, peer pressure. Saying no, or even not yet, can feel like positioning yourself as resistant, difficult, or not a team player.

 

Saying yes to something with no additional resources, no contract, and no clear ask to some makes you look like you are endorsing a ridiculous strategy.

 

If you genuinely believe that more integrated working improves care for patients, this is your why, but you risk burning yourself out against the tide of “No money and No contract!!!!

 

If you believe it in principle but cannot see how to do it without more resources, it of course needs to be said, but what do we do from here?

 

Choosing not to pursue something is a legitimate strategic position. The networks that do it well make the choice deliberately, own it, and move on, rather than half-committing and burning out in the process or saying no and then spending all your energy on explaining your position.


The Options


So what are the options?


➡️  Keep naming the problem:  This has its place, but on its own, it doesn't move anything. If you want a more structured way to think through what your network should actually be doing, I've written a framework for that here.


This blog and framework help you think through what you must do, what you could do, the trade-offs, and the risks and implications


➡️  Hold steady: Sometimes the right call; not every workstream is ready to move, and burning resources on things that aren't is its own risk


➡️  Work with what exists: The small movements that are possible within current constraints



What now?


The temptation in the chaos phase is to keep raising the alarm or go quiet and just cope.


Neither moves things forward.

 

The work is staying focused on what can actually shift. The relationships, governance, small decisions while the bigger picture continues to form.


The context is hard. Everyone knows it. The question is what you do next.



Last Week on The Business of Healthcare Podcast


Tara Humphrey and Nabeel Arshad on: How GP Practices Can Grow, Innovate & Truly Serve Patients. Icons for Spotify, YouTube, and Apple Podcasts.



Further Support


The PCN Members Club


If you need ongoing practical support for your neighbourhood conversations, join our PCN Members Club.


Facilitation

If your network would benefit from a neutral voice for those tricky partnership discussions, we provide in-person facilitation, too.


Interim Management

We are perfect for you if you are struggling to recruit and need someone who can hit the ground running until the time is right for you to hire your permanent PCN Manager. With the experience and expertise of leading 11 Training Hubs and supporting over 300 Primary Care Networks and 3 GP Federations, we understand and appreciate the complexity of healthcare and what it takes to deliver projects at scale.


Join our Newsletter

Stay informed with clear, reliable updates in a fast-changing landscape. Our newsletter brings together key insights and practical next steps.


Click here to find out more or contact admin@theprimarycare.co.uk to discuss the support you may need.

 


Pure Unity Health.jpg
Pure Unity Health (1).png
PCN PLUS LIVE Blog Advert.jpg
Pure THC Ad (2).png
medacy.png
CQCFIT.png

© Copyright 2026 by Tara Humphrey Consulting Ltd . All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction of content without written permission is prohibited. 

bottom of page